Is "Oblivion" The New "Matrix?"

I haven't seen this level of buzz within the alternative media about a movie in a good long while.

"Oblivion" is not only a box-office success, but is being cited by many as, simply, the new "Matrix" -- a study of revolution against the "Illuminati". (possible spoilers for the film to follow):

Like the classic film by the Wachowskis, "Oblivion" is about a dwindling humanity being exploited and oppressed by a machine-like "alien" force. As I've written before on this blog, movies like this and the upcoming "Elysium" speak to a future dystopia where the elites live "offworld" and the masses are left to fend for themselves in squalor. Ideas like outer space colonization and transhumanism are "pushed" by the mainstream, but the result could conceivably be a nightmare for humanity.

But two things really shock me about the box-office success, and alternative media embracement, of "Oblivion":

1) Tom Cruise is pretty much hated, both for his connections to Scientology and his oft-strange behavior (the infamous "Oprah's Couch' incident and his relationship with Katie Holmes being the two biggest examples). And yet, "Oblivion" has not been the first film Cruise has starred in that illustrates a struggle against sinister alien/elitist forces. I mean, he was in "Eyes Wide Shut," for Christ's sake!

2) The Scientology connection in general. Let's face it -- any movie Cruise stars in is going to be scrutinized as having symbolism related to the religion. And in the end, both "Oblivion" and Scientology are about humanity being oppressed/exploited by alien forces. Important to remember who actually inspired Scientology, however: Aleister Crowley, who has been repeatedly demonized (if you will excuse the pun) by some sectors of the alternative media community.

The most vocal supporter of "Oblivion" at the moment is current mainstream media darling villain Alex Jones, who calls the film an "Anti-Illuminati tour de force." In the video below, he goes into detail about the very symbolically-loaded design of the main baddie:

"The main alien spaceship called the Tetrad obviously represents the pyramid of control, the Illuminati power structure, centered in Rome. Note throughout the film the Tetrad pyramid spaceship, is shown upside-down to the way a pyramid is normally. This is just like satanist turning the cross of religion upside-down to disrespect it, so the inversion of the pyramid is showing disrespect to the Illuminati power structure. Also inverting the pyramid now places the people who were at the bottom of the pyramid above those who used to control them, showing the gaining of power by the awakened people."

"Stench Of Truth" has also recently reviewed it (noting especially its portrayal of drones as evil), and many mini-documentaries have popped up online analyzing its symbolism. "The Matrix" had a huge impact on the alternative media community in the late Nineties, almost tailor-made for a post-9/11 society -- David Icke has literally based a lot of his philosophy on the movie, basically co-opting the name.

Is "Oblivion" the next major "Anti-Illuminati" film? And is the Scientology "connection" (as thin and tenuous as that may be) significant at all (especially in light of the fact that the strangely-similar upcoming film "After Earth" features yet another celebrity connected to Scientology, Will Smith)?

Read More

Human Rights Watch: "Ban Killer Robots"

"As this report shows, robots with complete autonomy would be incapable of meeting international humanitarian law standards. The rules of distinction, proportionality, and military necessity are especially important tools for protecting civilians from the effects of war, and fully autonomous weapons would not be able to abide by those rules."
--"Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots"

Doing their part to slow down the coming Robopocalypse, the group Human Rights Watch has issued an unprecedented 50-page document asking governments around the world to "pre-emptively ban fully autonomous weapons because of the danger they pose to civilians in armed conflict."


Called "Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots," the document (which can be downloaded in full here) pretty much solidifies many decades-worth of trepidation over our artificially-created "friends" -- a sentiment that, for the most part, has only gotten "aired" through the veil of sci-fi novels and movies. Let's face it -- a serious researcher or organization writing a paper called "The Case Against Killer Robots" even a few years ago would have been laughed at as a kook.

But with the rise of drones, this has all changed. Maybe it's because the triangular-shaped drones don't quite have the personality of Rosie from "The Jetsons" or Data from "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Though a SNL animated skit that just aired this weekend envisions a way to market drones as more "cool":

Will the dystopian world envisioned by robotics engineer Daniel H. Wilson in his heavily-promoted 2011 novel "Robopocalypse" -- featuring lead villain "Archos" (compare to "Archon") come to pass? Of course, Human Rights Watch in their study refers to robots programmed to kill -- not ones who can actually think on their own. But not to worry, says Futurologist/Candidate For Immortality Ray Kurzweil:

"The reason that brain reverse engineering has not contributed much to artificial intelligence is that up until recently we didn’t have the right tools. If I gave you a computer and a few magnetic sensors and asked you to reverse-engineer it, you might figure out that there’s a magnetic device spinning when a file is saved, but you’d never get at the instruction set. Once you reverse-engineer the computer fully, however, you can express its principles of operation in just a few dozen pages.

"Now there are new tools that let us see the interneuronal connections and their signaling, in vivo, and in real-time. We’re just now getting these tools and there’s very rapid application of the tools to obtain the data."

However, though he sees a human-like AI to be an increasingly possible happening, he believes that is more likely that we will merge with the robot:

"But the most salient scenario is that we’ll gradually merge with our technology. We’ll use nanobots to kill pathogens, then to kill cancer cells, and then they’ll go into our brain and do benign things there like augment our memory, and very gradually they’ll get more and more sophisticated. There’s no single great leap, but there is ultimately a great leap comprised of many small steps.

"In The Singularity Is Near, I describe the radically different world of 2040, and how we’ll get there one benign change at a time. The Singularity will be gradual, smooth. "Really, this is about augmenting our biological thinking with nonbiological thinking...we'll get to the point where bio thinking is relatively insignificant...it’ll take time before we realize how much more powerful nonbiological thinking will ultimately be."

Of course, there's no way that such technology would ever be used by an unscrupulous government in such a way as to override one's basic humanity.

The funny thing here -- if there's indeed anything funny about all this -- is that we are truly and actively on the road to such situations, scientists staring down the barrel of the possible "assimilation" of humanity or "overthrow" by artificial intelligence with all the enthusiasm and forethought of Herbert West in "Re-Animator."

By the way, in case you're interested: "Robopocalypse" is set for a big-budget movie adaptation in 2014, directed by Steven Spielberg, who seems to really be hip on these trends.

Read More